Act Three Scene Three of Journeys End by RC Sheriff Essay examples --

Act Three Scene Three of Journeys EndJourneys end, written in 1918, is a short move set in the trenches ofWorld War One. The English trench is opposite a German trench withonly sixty or so yards of no mans land between them. The do triesto show the reality of war through ideas or comradeship and the waythat the characters interact under pressure of e genuinelyday life in thetrenches. The play in addition displays ideas of heroism through respect forother soldiers or characters. Overall it is the horror of war itselfthat is conveyed in this play, shown mainly through death and thelifestyle that had to be lead.Act terzetto Scene three is the very last scene of the play. From almostthe very beginning we have known that an attack from the German multitudeis to be expected. However, the characters in the play are non surewhen it will take place or in what form. As the attack could transpireat any given moment the tension is high throughout the play.This is not the only anxiety in th e script at the beginning of Actthree Scene three. Raleigh and Stanhope, the plays two most prominentcharacters, have had a large argument about the death of a mutualfriend, which they do not resolve before the beginning of this scene.The strain between these two characters has been immense for theduration of the play. They were previously well acquainted butStanhope feared that Raleigh, a recent penis to the company, wouldthink badly of him as he has become an alcoholic, and thereforerefuses to acknowledge him as a friend, but just a colleague. Raleighhas found this very hard to accept.The audience is not only expecting the attack, but also for Stanhopeand Raleigh to clear the air once and for all so they can re... ...is about workingssuccessfully with others in one big machine. If the parts of thatmachine do not work together then it will break down. He also wantedto portray the absolute horror and injustice that war has to offer. Hedoes this extremely successfully as he makes the audience feelencapsulated in the square experience of war. Even though he is tellingthem what it is like, he leaves freedom for them to develop their ownview on it.Overall, I think that R.C.Sherriff was trying to express that the humanside of war is futile. Nobody wins, a lot of people die withoutaccomplishing a great deal, and from whatever angle you chose to lookat it, the self-coloured idea is pointless, causing more pain than isnecessary. Should all this commotion be vital, just to gain anotherthirty metres, which will most probably be return to the rightfulowner in due time anyway?